Back to Solutions Library
Solution 19 of 25PWS · Process ImprovementFO · Accounting
OIG and Audit Response Tracking and Remediation
RD must track open OIG findings (the FY 2023 $315M ULO finding, the FY 2025 repeat continuous-monitoring finding, FY 2025 undocumented-grant finding) and GAO recommendations through closure, but remediation tracking is fragmented across program offices, NFAOC, and OBP — leaving RD vulnerable to repeat findings and slow closure cycles.
Why It Matters
Open findings degrade the AFR, expose RD leadership to Hill / OMB scrutiny, and consume Acting Under Secretary attention. Smooth, transparent remediation tracking signals to OIG / GAO that RD is taking findings seriously and accelerates closure.
HSG's Approach
- 1Stand up a centralized OIG / GAO finding tracker with each finding mapped to owner, target close date, corrective action plan, supporting evidence, and current status.
- 2Build a remediation evidence repository tied to the finding tracker, with version control and immutable audit log.
- 3Use AI tooling to surface findings nearing target close dates without supporting evidence and to draft management-response narratives.
- 4Pair every AI-drafted response with expert review and capture in the AI / Expert Reconciliation Log.
- 5Produce a monthly remediation dashboard for senior leadership.
Expected Deliverables
- OIG / GAO finding tracker (production)
- Remediation evidence repository
- Management-response narrative auto-draft tool
- Monthly remediation dashboard
- SOP for finding-owner workflow and escalation
Expected Outcome
Close 80% of open findings on or before target close date and reduce repeat-finding incidence to zero on the highest-materiality findings.